On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 01:05:45AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > It's fairly easy to say "we're debating the QPL; this may affect these > packages ...", but it's very hard to do the same for a specific restriction, > which is probably what you're really looking for. The best that could be > hoped for is common language to grep for, which usually works to a degree, > but it's not reliable ...
To be honest, I don't see any way to announce "we're debating about this random clause" and have people get interested. Perhaps in the announcement email with the license and package names include a quick summary of the contested points? - David Nusinow