Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>We should concentrate on the real problems, namely the clause of >>venue and QPL 6c, which i have ground to believe will be no problem >>for upstream anymore, altough i have no official answer yet, and QPL >>3b, which still remains problematic. > > Does that actually mean QPL 6 will be removed from the OCaml license? > Oh Frabjuous Day! > > Or just QPL 6c? That would not be frabjuous, but I still might > callay.
What is your objection to 6a and 6b? I personally think 6c is the only problematic part of 6. - Josh Triplett
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
