On Mon, Jul 26, 2004 at 09:58:16AM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> > Also, consider the annotation : > >> > > >> > This doesn't really need to be stated, since to do so would be > >> > fraudulent. > >> > > >> > Do we really need to continue arguing about this close ? > >> > >> Yes -- the annotation is incorrect. This is much more restrictive > >> than the law requires. There are many honest activities which break > >> this clause. > > > > Ok, propose an alternate concise writing of this, please ? > > "You must include appropriate and accurate copyright notices on each > source file, and in a reasonable and appropriate place in any binary > file."
Not clear enough. A quick reader would read that you can replace the copyright notice by another. Also, QPL 3 deals with source modification and distribution as patches, not binaries. Friendly, Sven Luther
