On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 10:44:39PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 04:34:33PM +0000, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > Francesco P. Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://www.mysql.com/products/licensing/foss-exception.html
> >  
> > > A few programs link currently the old non-GPL libmysqlclient10 in order
> > > to retain compatibility with other free licenses which have known
> > > problems and require exceptions (e.g. openssl). AFAIK the new
> > > statement should allow all those program to link the current 
> > > libmysqlclient instead. See proftpd-mysql for an example of such kind
> > > of programs.
> > 
> > Could you readjust my glasses? You explicitely mention OpenSSL but I
> > cannot see it on the webpage. Is 'BSD license       "July 22 1999"' supposed
> > to apply?
> > 
> 
> Mmm, I'm quite miopic too, anyway both licenses in openssl are bsd-like 
> (with advertising clauses) and they are compatible with OpenSource Initiative 
> criteria, as pointed in http://www.opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.php. 
> So they are acceptable for MySQL FOSS exception.

What, even the SSLeay license? It's not a BSD license, and fuck knows
what "compatible with OpenSource Initiative criteria" is supposed to
mean.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to