Pierre HABOUZIT wrote: > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 10:57:57AM +0200, Christian BAYLE wrote: >> As far as I know QPL is considered an non DFSG compatible >> >> "Restrictions, such as giving the author your changes if they ask, are >> not DFSG-free." >> >> found on debian-legal >> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/04/msg00259.html >> >> Though this is considered as a free license by FSF not GPL Compatible >> http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.fr.html#GPLIncompatibleLicenses >> >> I CC this to debian-legal, (please CC me, directly) to know if I can put >> this QPL licensed code knowing this is php script >> http://www.aditus.nu/jpgraph/index.php >> http://www.trolltech.com/licenses/qpl.html >> >> >> Christian > > Well, I'm not from debian-legal, but please have a look on ocaml, it's a > QPL software, and is in the main archive ! > > and well, it's not the only one : > > grep -rl "THE Q PUBLIC LICENSE" */copyright
> cervisia/copyright This is QPL-only, and a bug should likely be filed. :sigh: (This is the real QPL, with Norway and Oslo.) > kapptemplate/copyright > kbabel/copyright > kbugbuster/copyright > kcachegrind/copyright > kdesdk/copyright > kdesdk-kfile-plugins/copyright > kdesdk-misc/copyright > kdesdk-scripts/copyright > kompare/copyright > kspy/copyright > kuiviewer/copyright > umbrello/copyright > poxml/copyright > libcvsservice0/copyright These are mostly GPL-only, in fact. (With a few LGPL, BSD, etc.) The confusion is due to the fact that all of the above and cervisia share a single source package and copyright file. > libqt3c102-mt/copyright > libqt3-headers/copyright > libqt3-mt-dev/copyright > qt3-designer/copyright > qt3-dev-tools/copyright > qt3-doc/copyright These are all dual QPL-GPL. > ocaml/copyright The "compiler" is QPL-only. This is another modified QPL, governed by French law and with venue in Versailles. ICK. So out of that list, there are two QPL-only programs. -- There are none so blind as those who will not see.
