On 2004-07-07 12:42:22 +0100 Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 12:32:27AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: >> I just got a cc of questions sent by a Mozilla rep to the relevant >> person. >> More news later, hopefully. [...] > Has there been any progress on this? Not much. I provided some supplementary information and got a first reply on 30 June. Here is the current situation. Please let me know if I have accidentally dropped something: The LEGAL update notice should be not a problem for software licensed by the Mozilla Foundation under the MPL. The usual public announcements of changes to debian packages are sufficient. The Mozilla Foundation regards their CVS repository as fulfilling the requirement to offer source. The venue clause looks like it inescapably commits any licensee to be judged in that US venue. I'm still not sure about this. I asked another question about it on 1 July, with no reply yet. The aim is to provide "consistency", although I'm not sure what that means. There are currently no plans to produce a new version of the MPL. (For information: I am corresponding with Gervase Markham and Mitchell Baker.) -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and not of any group I know http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing "To be English is not to be baneful / To be standing by the flag not feeling shameful / Racist or partial..." (Morrissey)
RFC3156 defines security multipart formats for MIME with OpenPGP.
pgpKjsApVdy59.pgp
Description: PGP signature
