MJ wrote: > The reference offered as showing that SGI B is considered non-free only > showed one post to me, not a discussion.
I think I also referenced Bug #211765, where the license is described as non-free, and a longer discussion is referenced: http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2003/09/msg00410.html Regarding the Nokia license, the maintainer asking the question seemed to conclude the license was non-free: "Thanks for everyone's opinion. The consensus is that this license is not compatible with the DFSG." http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/09/msg00136.html Original discussion: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/08/msg01804.html > Would Jim Marhaus or someone who knows him please introduce him to us? I'm just a Debian user, been reading debian-legal off and on for a few years. Thanks for continuing this discussion, -Jim
