Andreas Metzler wrote: >I do not consider this to "go much further than that". The intention is >imho the one DFSG4 tries to carter for. The author wants: >a) derivatives being detectable as such. >b) derivatives have to keep out of xinetd's namespace. He wants to >forbid a derivative being numbered as xinetd 2.3.15, taking away the >official version number.
But it also forbids incorporating sections of code from xinetd into any other work unless those change their version string to match. Simply requiring that the name be changed would have the desired effect and be DFSG-free (grudgingly on our part, but I understand authors' concerns here to some extent). -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
