On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 06:36:12AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > > The problem with striking it entirely is that we then have to deal with > > > the people who misinterpret the DFSG to claim that the GPL is not free. > > > Which was the reason that clause was placed there in the first place. > > On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:56:02AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I'm not going to be able to regard this as a credible claim without a > > citation. > > Here's Bruce's first draft of the DFSG (which expanded on what > the policy manual had to say). This was before discussion.
I'm not neglecting this message, but I have not had time to digest it yet. I appreciate you gathering this historical context; it's important. I will reply when I have grokked in fullness, or given it the college try. :) -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | Extra territorium jus dicenti [EMAIL PROTECTED] | impune non paretur. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
