On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 03:26:19PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > The problem, here, is that "GPL" really represents a class of licenses. > That class includes a [currently empty] set of licenses which prevent > distribution in certain countries. That set is non-free, but that > doesn't make the GPL not be an example of a free license.
So you're changing your claim to "DFSG#10 requires that the DFSG be interpreted such that some applications--but not all--of the GPL are free". -- Glenn Maynard
