On 2004-05-14 10:58:00 +0100 Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
However, you can't base that claim on the assertion that the license is non-free. "Contaminating other software" would make the license non-free, but the converse is not necessarily true.
Does this post stating truisms mean anything besides a lower Signal:Noise ratio? I am not sure whether it contains any new information, nor whether you expect a reply.
-- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ for creative copyleft computing
