@ 11/05/2004 20:55 : wrote Raul Miller :
Of course for copyright purposes it might be reasonable to say that the painting and the notice together are contained in the work.Similarly, I could hand you a book and tell you that I license to you all my rights in that book under the terms of the GPL, and the GPL would apply.And if you lied? Or changed your mind? Or if I lied? How could a judge know that I wasn't lying when I tell him you said it was a GPLed work?
google: "estoppel" -- br,M
