On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 09:26:16PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > > This is a case in which DFSG#3 very explicitly does not require derived > > works to be distributable. > > Agreed, though the convolutions you went through don't really have any > bearing on this point.
Of course it does. You claimed, as far as I can tell, that the GPL's requirement that derived works be available under the GPL's terms is a restriction on modification; I explained that this is explicitly allowed by the latter part of DFSG#3. If that is not what you meant, then please explain more clearly what you did mean. (If the explanation of what you did mean results in a similar response to another subthread, such as to Steve's reply, feel free to bump the reply over there.) -- Glenn Maynard
