Fabian Bastin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just a little question. > >> If you want a copyleft license for your work debian-legal recommends >> the GPL v2.0. > > What is the recommendation if you want a copyleft license, but no as > strong as the GPL, in particular if you consider that simply linking a > module does not produce a derivative work? The LGPL has an annonying > point since it allows anybody to distribute the product in GPL instead > of LGPL.
I don't know of a license that does specifically what you want, though I don't think it would be hard to come up with one. I think the reason there isn't one is that there's little reason for such a license. If you want to give extra permissions, just use the LGPL. Why is it important for your works to be GPL-incompatible? -- Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03
