On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 03:38:31PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:33:04PM +0200, Jeremie Koenig wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 11:55:03AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > > Jeremie Koenig wrote: > > > > The plan was to request a sarge-ignore tag on the "d-i build-depends on > > > > miboot, which is in contrib", and try to find a better solution for next > > > > releases. > > > > > > This is the first I've heard of this. Has the sarge-ignore status of the > > > GFDL docs really created such a slippery slope? I doubt it. > > > > I've posted my intentions here and noone seemed to object.
I meant, a few monthes ago. > I objected! At least if it's a real build-depends, in which case it will > break d-i autobuilds. Yes, i've understood this, you're obviously right and I no longer want d-i to build-depend on contrib stuff. -- Jeremie Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
