----- Original Message ----- From: "MJ Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "selussos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <debian-legal@lists.debian.org> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 5:38 PM Subject: Re: Debian Legal summary of the X-Oz License
> > 4. Except as contained in this notice, the name of X-Oz > > Technologies > > shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote > > the sale, > > use or other dealings in this Software without prior > > written > > authorization from X-Oz Technologies. > > Why does this clause attempt to use a copyright licence forbid basic > rights granted in most trademark law? > Why does it speak of "this Software" instead of the more usual > "products derived from this Software"? > > Thanks, > > -- > MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. > This clause is also in the X.org license and is found throughout X. We chose to be specific because we are the _only_ copyright holder, which is not the case, as you will notice, for X.org. Thanks for letting me clear that one up. Best Regards Sue You can tell whether a man is clever by his answers. You can tell whether a man is wise by his questions. - Naguib Mahfouz
