* Hubert Chan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [This program] is in the public domain. The original upstream source is
> released under the Cypherpunks anti-License (CPL), which places the
> program in the public domain, and includes additional clarifying text.
> Neither Debian, nor Software in the Public Interest, nor any of their
> agents specifically make the same pledges as are contained in the
> license. The complete text of the license follows below:
Looks good to me. Maybe you should be a touch more specific about which
licence you are referring too (even though the package you are
distributing won't have a licence of its own). I would suggest changing
the wording from 'the license' to 'that license' ('the complete text of
that license'.
On the other hand, I could just be picky - the statement is reasonably
clear.
Regards,
Nic Suzor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
