On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 07:33:34PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: > Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > As you can see, linking is not the metric used. Only derivation is. > >> > >> Yes, and I say linking isn't a case of derivation. I can easily > >> find any number of people that disagree with RMS about this, so > >> who's right? > > > > If you or other people claim that linking is not a case of derivation, > > they can advance arguments about it. Your arguments will be taken even > > more seriously by volunteering a reasonable chunk of change to defend > > such an argument in a court of law. I think 1-5M US$ ought to suffice. > > Oh yes, I forgot. Whoever has more money is right.
In cases of ambiguity, correct. Which is why "ambiguous" means "no" as far as Debian is concerned. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
