Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > As you can see, linking is not the metric used. Only derivation is. >> >> Yes, and I say linking isn't a case of derivation. I can easily >> find any number of people that disagree with RMS about this, so >> who's right? > > If you or other people claim that linking is not a case of derivation, > they can advance arguments about it. Your arguments will be taken even > more seriously by volunteering a reasonable chunk of change to defend > such an argument in a court of law. I think 1-5M US$ ought to suffice.
Oh yes, I forgot. Whoever has more money is right. -- Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED]
