[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Argh. Yes, but the firmware in these eeproms is something that we're >entirely logically capable of shipping. Claiming that firmware is >sometimes software (when it's on a compact flash card, say) and >sometimes hardware (when it's on an eeprom, say) is the sort of argument >that the social contract changes were meant to deal with. If it's a >string of bits encoded on something, we're meant to apply the DFSG to >it, not argue about whether it's software or not. Again, I fully agree with this.
-- ciao, Marco
