"Marco d'Itri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>be provided while keeping the packages in contrib), but I didn't see >>anything where you argued that a package in main that requires software >>not in our archive was not a violation of Policy and the Social Contract >>(other than many unsupported assertions that only the hardware required >>the firmware, not the driver).
> I obviously consider this assertion well supported and central to my > point. Perhaps then you can provide an example of what the driver can do in a world where all the Windows driver-CDs have vanished, and there is only a device plaintively calling out for a firmware download in my machine. Can the driver do anything? -- Brian Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
