Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > And, if that seems nonsensical to you, you're right -- or, at least, >> > that scenario seems rather nonsensical to me. Debian currently doesn't >> > represent the kind of market which could lead to this kind of situation. > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 05:44:36PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> I'm not suggesting that that's why they're doing it. I'm suggesting that >> our moving the driver in response suggests that something is wrong. > > You're arguing semantics, at best.
There are all sorts of reasons that a vendor may put an eeprom on a device in a later revision. The fact that they do so should not alter the section that a driver appears in any more than changing from a CD to floppy should. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
