On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 06:09:29AM -0400, I wrote: > Instead, it's pointing out that you can't prohibit employees [for > example, ad subsidiaries] from distributing it to your competitors or
Er, I meant "at", not "ad". -- Raul
On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 06:09:29AM -0400, I wrote: > Instead, it's pointing out that you can't prohibit employees [for > example, ad subsidiaries] from distributing it to your competitors or
Er, I meant "at", not "ad". -- Raul