Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Dec 9, 2003, at 08:25, Arnoud Engelfriet wrote: > >>> >>> That doesn't follow. If we assume linking at runtime means creating a >>> derivative work before runtime, then we can conclude only that the >>> plugin is a derivative work of the plugin host. >> >> It is the host that loads the plugin into its memory, not vice >> versa. So it is the host that does the linking. > > A derivative work MUST be based on a pre-existing work. Title 17 USC > Sec. 101 is very clear on that. > > The host was written before the plugin. It thus can't be a derivative > work of the plugin.
But the combination of the host and the plugin is a derivative of the plugin -- or is a compilation containing the plugin, or is a mere aggregation containing the plugin, depending on the intent of the author of that combination. -Brian -- Brian T. Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.evenmere.org/~bts/