Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> When we see a plugin written under the GPL for a GPL-incompatible work, >> we have two choices: > >> - Assume the author of the plugin was confused, and that the plugin >> isn't even distributable, or >> - Assume that the author intends that the plugin have an implicit >> exception for the gpl-incompatible work. > > - Assume that the author knows what he's doing after all, and only > intends for the plugin to be distributable in source format until a > GPL-compatible framework comes along.
But the framework *is* GPL compatible. It's another plugin that's not. -- Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED]
