On 2003-11-26, Alex Schroeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hm, maybe that is up to the courts to decide. It doesn't look like a
> copyleft to me, but that's just my first impression. I'm used to this
> definition from the FSF site:
>
> Copyleft is a general method for making a program free software
> and requiring all modified and extended versions of the program to
> be free software as well.
I think if you want to use non-standard words like "copyleft", you
should include this definition in the license. I think you should
also define "free software".
The BSD Preservation License would not fit this definition of "copyleft".
Peace,
Dylan
