Glenn Maynard wrote: > I believe Arnoud Engelfriet mentioned that this clause (#5) has been > removed from the draft. I havn't checked. If so, that's good; this > is clearly the most problematic clause.
Jennifer Machovec, who's drafting the license, posted a new version to license@apache.org on November 13. You can read it at http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=24 It actually has two versions; the first was supposed to be a redlined version but that has been stripped out by the mailing list archive. The 'clean' version is at about 2/3rds of the page. Arnoud -- Arnoud Engelfriet, Dutch patent attorney - Speaking only for myself Patents, copyright and IPR explained for techies: http://www.iusmentis.com/
