Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > If you feel that the GPL needs clarification for the term 'object code', add > a specific notice stating what forms you consider to be object code (not > source code) in your interpretation.
But make sure this "clarification" functions as an additional preamble or an additional permission rather than as a patch to the GPL which might create a new version of the GPL incompatible with other versions. Consider, for example, a case where two people write GPL documentation, but one writes that the "source" must be in LaTeX and the other writes that the "source" must be in Lout.
