On Thu, 02 Oct 2003, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> The first part seems to indicate that purposes that are illegal in >> England are prohibited by the license. This is is a usage restraint, >> as England might choose to make certain useages of information >> illegal, whereas they remain legal in other countries. > > No, I think that's not right. It says "judge this agreement under > the law of England". The law of England might well interpret the > clause you cite as referring to "illegal according to the local > jurisdiction".
Oh, definetly. It's clearly open for interpretation, my issue is that it's very vague and has to be interpreted. Eg, where do the laws of England stop and the laws of the jurisdiction of the licensee begin? The most conservative approach is to assume that you are going to be subject to the most restrictive set of laws of either the local jurisdiction or the agreement's. Don Armstrong -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot http://www.donarmstrong.com http://www.anylevel.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
