Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (frankly, I'd be fine with it being unmodifiable *but removeable*, and > distributing it thus, since anyone who cares *can* remove it, still).
Um, isn't that precisely what we're talking about?
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (frankly, I'd be fine with it being unmodifiable *but removeable*, and > distributing it thus, since anyone who cares *can* remove it, still).
Um, isn't that precisely what we're talking about?