On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 10:44:38AM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote: > +++++++++++++LIBCHK END USER LICENCE+++++++++++ > > BY RETRIEVING THIS DISTRIBUTION OF LIBCHK, YOU ARE CONSENTING > TO BE BOUND BY THIS AGREEMENT. IF YOU DO NOT AGREE TO ALL OF THE > TERMS OF THIS AGREEMENT, DO NOT INSTALL THE PRODUCT, AND DESTROY YOUR > COPY.
A false statement followed by a command. That's not exactly what I expect from a license, which is supposed to PERMIT things. Regardless of its enforceability, I don't think we should package this software if its authors firmly believe that a user who types "apt-get install libchk" thereby agrees to an agreement he hasn't seen yet. They're trying to restrict use as well as distribution. Richard Braakman
