RMS On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 05:05:52PM -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > I don't really believe it. In the 1980s, formalized free software was a > new concept for almost everybody. Today, there are too many free > software projects for the word _not_ to get out. > > My experience is just the opposite: our views are mostly suppressed. > The open source movement is very effective at substituting their word > for ours. I find that most of the people who use our software have > never even heard of our philosophy.
I find that to be a cheap, and unworthy shot by you against the Open Source movement. It lowers my opinion of you, and by your strong association with it, the FSF. To cry conspiracy because a like-minded group "is more effective" at spreading the word casts you in a lunatic, fanatical light. For my part when talking with people within IT few see any difference between the Free and Open groups. And why should they if they coming from proprietary-land? Comments like yours do nothing to help and only drive a wedge between the two groups that should be fighting the "good fight" together. If, and I mean "if", we see more references to "open" then that may be because "open" has less baggage than "free", and has be judged as a better term to use to enlighten the masses. Personally I think of "Common Software", but then I'm English and I grew up with "English Common Law" and the "Village Common" as terms in everyday use. This has instilled within me that "common" [1] can mean "belonging to the whole community". But this has taken us to far off topic. While I accept and endorse the requirement of a derived work to give credit to the other authors, I have yet to be convinced that "Invariant" sections are the way to do it. I do not see why a "Document History" section containing (at least) the past copyright notices, authors' names and URLs would not do the job better. I would appreciate if in future you would restrict you comments to the need for the Invariant sections within the GFDL. Steve [1] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=common While "common" does have a derogatory connotation to my mind the term is less problematic than "free" or "open". -- The easiest way to get the root password is to become system admin. -- Unknown source
pgpC9F0S4QUAK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
