On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 12:16:17AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 08:23:23PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > > Thoughts on WDL: > > > > Is "opiniated" really a word or a smelling pistake? There's probably > > some better name. > > Agreed, but "opiniated" was the best I could come up with. In any case, > since it can be modified, "invariant" surely is a bad name. > > It's been brought to my attention, however, that 'opiniated' is a > strange construct in the English language, and that 'opinionated' would > be better. I'm not a native English speaker; I'll leave that to the > experts. What's important is the definition, not the wording, so if > someone comes up with a word that better defines what these sections do, > I'll happily use that word.
"Irrelevant" -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
pgpT5U4NQEOts.pgp
Description: PGP signature