I'm a little concerned about merely offering a link to things. FSF has
always argued against this as regards offers of source, in particular
because there are parts of the world where 56k access speeds would be
fast, and because some are charged per minute for such access. Perhaps
documentation doesn't get so large, but in general, putting the burden
on distributors might be better.
I'm also unaware of free software that modifies all .pdf documents, and
even if there is such a thing, it seems likely to me that Adobe might
pursue patent infringement claims on such software, so I'd prefer .pdf
be cut from the list of acceptable "transparent" formats.
--
Brian -- http://rurnt.com/brian ,''`.
Try a free operating system at http://www.debian.org : :' :
Support EFF! http://www.eff.org `. `'
They're defending YOUR rights online! `-
