On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 09:51:22AM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > * Open Publication License; debian-legal archives show > that it may have been considered free at one time but now is > questionable. Can anyone shed some light there?
As I recall, the OPL has a thing equivalent to the GNU FDL's Cover Texts. The GNU FDL's Cover Texts are immutable and unremovable, and so are the OPL's. > * Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike[1] seems to be endorsed by some, > though I couldn't find much discussion. Thoughts? [...] > [1] http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/legalcode Why don't you post the license text in a new thread and we can sink our teeth into it? Now that I've relieved myself of my LPPL analysis obligation, I'm ready for a new challenge. It may help distract me from the GNU FDL discussion, which I think Bruce would like to see. :-P -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | If encryption is outlawed, only [EMAIL PROTECTED] | outlaws will @goH7Ok=<q4fDj]Kz?. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpTRRZGJBAg7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
