Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If the GFDL invariant section was used to include political statement > that have nothing to do with computers (like racist statement, as > proposed before), I would find normal to trash these documentation > that use the GFDL invariant section for a purpose out of the scope of > Debian. > > But a political stand about computers within a documentation > describing the software does not seems a problem to me: it documents > the software! It's the purpose of the documentation. Then it is non-Secondary, and may not be Invariant. The license is thus inconsistent and fails to apply; we may not distribute the work at all. > While at the contrary, including the manifesto within emacs, for > instance, does not require a protection (it's not a part of the > software and can be safely removed, if present). > > > -- > Mathieu Roy > > Homepage: > http://yeupou.coleumes.org > Not a native english speaker: > http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english
