Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030829 00:05]: > > Andreas Barth wrote: > > >I don't think it's good manners to try to push a certain view by > > >putting it on the web sites. No, first finish the discussion in d-l, > > >and the you _might_ put additions on the web site. (Though I think > > >it's even then not the right place for that; but that's a different > > >point of view.) > > > The discussion *is* finished. > > Please allow me three remarks: > 1. I always said it's usefull to remove GFDL-invariant/cover texts > from main. That's _not_ the point of discussion here. > 2. It's certainly undue to make such a proposal just a moment before > the end of a poll. Wait for the poll-result.
The poll is just telling us what we already know. This is not a new topic that people are still trying to figure out. > 3. It's IMHO never good to make any too formal statement in the heat of > a discussion, if it can be avoided. That's valid for making a DFDG, > and also for changes of web sites. Settle a discussion first, and > when everyone has cold blood again, make the official statements. > (That also means that though I would consider a DFDG usefull, it's > now not the proper time to make it.) The discussion _has_ been finished for quite a while. All we are seeing now is people who haven't bothered to read the last few years of debian-legal. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
