On 2003-08-29 15:53:09 +0100 Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Because the DFSG is not DFSG compliant.
AFAICT, the DFSG is under the OPL with no options enabled and that licence is considered DFSG-free. Am I missing something?
- Re: documentation eq software ? Richard Braakman
- Re: documentation eq software ? Andrew Suffield
- Re: documentation eq software ? Anthony DeRobertis
- Re: documentation eq software ? Anthony DeRobertis
- Re: documentation eq software ? Joe Moore
- Re: documentation eq software ? Mathieu Roy
- [HUMOR] Re: documentation eq software ? Branden Robinson
- Re: documentation eq software ? Anthony DeRobertis
- Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq s... Steve Langasek
- Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq s... Mathieu Roy
- Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq s... MJ Ray
- Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq s... Mathieu Roy
- Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq s... MJ Ray
- Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq s... Steve Langasek
- Can I modify the DFSG (and not derive from)? Mathieu Roy
- Re: Can I modify the DFSG (and not derive from)? David Schleef
- Re: Can I modify the DFSG (and not derive from)? MJ Ray
- Re: Can I modify the DFSG (and not derive from)? Josselin Mouette
- Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq s... Joe Moore
- Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq s... Anthony DeRobertis
- Re: [was A possible GFDL compromise] documentation eq s... Branden Robinson
