Fedor Zuev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MR>Why do you consider these a replacement for articles 15-23
> MR>instead of a supplement? Have I misunderstood article 69a(4)?
> It is irrelevant. Even if articles 15-23 is still valid for
> software, they adds a very small additional restriction for users
> comparatively to 69c. Contrary is not true.
Depends on the licence, surely? 69c seems to be mostly clarifications
for programs (not software in general) and 15-23 still stand.
Bottom lines:
1. Software is treated under basically the same law;
2. I need to check this is still the same in the latest version.
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ jabber://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
