Fedor Zuev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course, you can claim that the very special definition of > "software" should and will be used for the sole purpose of the > interpretation of DFSG and Social Contract. [...]
Yes! We use that very special definition listed in dictionaries and understood by many people here! (Nick Phillips, for example, in http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200308/msg00247.html ) Or when you agree with the DFSG, are you using your own special dictionary? [...] > AD>How Debian choses to apply its principals of freedom and to what works > AD>it choses to apply them has NO RELATION to what will land you in jail, > AD>NO RELATION to what is legal > You can not ignore the existence of a laws even if you will > try twice as hard. Please explain how your local laws giving you more rights over a copyright text means that the DFSG should not still be satisfied. And ditch the supercite, please. -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know. http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ jabber://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
