On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 04:52:52PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > standard does not change the standard), the key difference is that we > can choose not to distribute the RFCs. Technically we /can/ choose not > to distribute copyright notices and licenses, but as a pragmatic > concession to copyright law, we opt for a non-empty distro instead. ;)
Can I take this, then, as an admission that we willfully distribute non-free software in main, and intend to continue doing so, because we perceive a lack of alternatives? (In the form of, for instance, public domain software)
