On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 06:33:27PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 11:15:52AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > I see nothing strong enough to be called "consensus" either way. > > > > I see no case made by anyone for the UnicodeData.txt license as (in the > > form it was in at the time -- for all I know it's been changed since > > then) DFSG-free. > > That's quite bad, then. If we can't get this file to be free somehow, > we'll have to remove all unicode (and utf-8) support.
IIRC, Thomas Bushnell disagrees. I really don't care to rehash the arguments on this point; they're in -devel during November and December of last year. -- G. Branden Robinson | The National Security Agency is Debian GNU/Linux | working on the Fourth Amendment [EMAIL PROTECTED] | thing. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Phil Lago, Deputy XD, CIA
pgpAwnSIJCWLw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
