Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] *this* is something that belongs in non-free as
> a useful service.
People could provide an RFC apt source as a useful service.
[...policy vs users?...]
> Isn't that more or less exactly what some folks have been accusing the FSF
> of recently?
I don't think so.
> Things shouldn't stay in non-free, no. [...]
Would you support a "maximum length of stay" proposal for non-free?
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ jabber://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
Thought: "Changeset algebra is really difficult."
