On Thu, 22 May 2003, Nick Phillips wrote: > I would assert, though, that it is possible to phrase one's > construction such that it is not reasonable to argue about it.
Sure. I think most of us would agree that an unequivocally proper phrasing of such a construction is to rewrite the entire license. There may be less strenuous proper phrasings, but I can't think of one that addresses all of my concerns. > It would then follow that the question becomes "where do we draw the > line?" I think that's something that we will have to broach for each license that we discuss, until we get a good feel for it. I'd gather that most of us agree with additions that grant permisions, but a few of us are wary of additions that add restrictions. [I think some of the discussion regarding mplayer bears this out.] Don Armstrong -- Three little words. (In decending order of importance.) I love you -- hugh macleod http://www.gapingvoid.com/graphics/batch35.php http://www.donarmstrong.com http://www.anylevel.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
pgpegqWyAEIvD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
