On Sun, May 18, 2003 at 04:56:17PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > >When some popular enough software becomes non-free, there is very often > >a free fork which gets maintained. If that happens to some non-free > >documentation as well, that's fine, but I don't think you will find > >many volunteers to do that. > > I'd do it for GCC. Unfortunately, there's no clearly free version of > the manual which is even remotely recent, so I'd actually have to write > it from scratch, which I'm not up to doing. > > Actually... given that several GCC contributors aren't happy with the > GFDL and invariant sections, maybe we could add up all the parts *we* > contributed (since the copyright assignment agreement still gives us the > right to use our own works) and see what it adds up to.
I wholeheartedly encourage you in this endeavor. Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help. -- G. Branden Robinson | Fair use is irrelevant and Debian GNU/Linux | improper. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Asst. U.S. Attorney Scott http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | Frewing, explaining the DMCA
pgp0vCP9KRauD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
