On 17 May 2003, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > I'd like to believe the former. I think, deep down, that it's probably > > the first on a conscious level, but it's the latter driving deep in the > > psyche. Can't totall fault that - one tends to get rather protective of > > one's life's work... > > Neither. > > The Emacs manual contained non-free invariant sections long before > Linux was a twinkle in anyone's eye.
That makes me even more worried. It means that RMS must truly believe that restricting useful freedoms is a good thing. Oh how the mighty have fallen... -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- #include <disclaimer.h> Matthew Palmer, Geek In Residence http://ieee.uow.edu.au/~mjp16
