Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Glenn Maynard wrote: > > On Mon, May 12, 2003 at 07:45:51PM +0200, Arnoud Galactus Engelfriet wrote: > > > The motivation for making them unrevokable is to prevent > > > authors from being forced to accept unconditional surrender > > > of their works. Then they could be made to look like total > > > > So the only way to prevent this is to remove my right to do it at all? > > That's ludicrous. Rights are not preserved by revoking other rights. > > The law wants to prevent you, as an author, from being forced > to unconditionally surrender your copyrights. That's why the > moral rights are not revokable and not tranferable.
"Forced"? Please explain what this supposed "force" is to consist in.
