On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 02:03:34AM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > It probably leaves a bad taste in the mouth of everyone on this list, > but yes. You're coming closest to violating DFSG 3, if, for example, the > license required me to actively notify ABC Software, Inc. of the > changes.
Some of Branden's arguments in http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200303/msg00829.html may be relevant to the "license" Jonathan asked about, but probably not with respect to DFSG5/6, so it may not be relevant to his real question. That is, the text he gave may pass DFSG5/6, but be non-free for other reasons. I don't know if there was any consensus reached from the above post. -- Glenn Maynard
