Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jonathan Fine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > My concern is with the Debian Free License, and the > > non-dsicrimination guideline. > > > > Suppose ABC Software takes a DFL and from it creates > > a new license (call it ABC-DFL) by adding the clause: > >> If the licensee is ABC Software Inc then the licensee > >> may freely incorporate this work into its proprietary > >> software. > > > > My question is this: Does this ABC-DFL license meet the > > Debian Free Software Guidelines? > > Must modifications be under the ABC-DFL? If so, it's non-free because > to modify it you must agree that ABC can use your code in their > proprietary stuff. Is this what you're getting at? > > Otherwise, it's free, afaict.
Didn't the QPL used to have this exact feature? It was considered free at the time, wasn't it?
