On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 04:34:54PM -0700, Alex Romosan wrote: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > You have turned the DFSG soundly on its head. In a world of > > copyrights, all works are non-free *by default*; it is only if they > > meet certain requirements, as detailed in the DFSG, that we consider > > them free. Are you saying that the WHY-FREE op-ed piece should be > > considered free because the DFSG doesn't say anything about opinion > > pieces? > > _you_ have turned the DFSG on its head by taking something meant for > software and applying it to non software.
Fine; under clause 1 of the Social Contract, we need to get all the shit that isn't software out of Debian *right now*. # Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software We promise to keep the Debian GNU/Linux Distribution entirely free software.[1] What part of the above don't you understand? [1] http://www.debian.org/social_contract -- G. Branden Robinson | Fair use is irrelevant and Debian GNU/Linux | improper. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Asst. U.S. Attorney Scott http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | Frewing, explaining the DMCA
pgpkjueE0lDYa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
